<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for iman's Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darabi.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darabi.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:11:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on (خاطرات جواهرده و لپاسر ( قسمت اول by (خاطرات جواهرده و لپاسر ( قسمت دوم &#171; iman&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://darabi.wordpress.com/2008/07/29/%d8%ae%d8%a7%d8%b7%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d8%ac%d9%88%d8%a7%d9%87%d8%b1%d8%af%d9%87-%d9%88-%d9%84%d9%be%d8%a7%d8%b3%d8%b1-%d9%82%d8%b3%d9%85%d8%aa-%d8%a7%d9%88%d9%84/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>(خاطرات جواهرده و لپاسر ( قسمت دوم &#171; iman&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darabi.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] قسمت قبل در مورد جواهرده صحبت کردم . ولی مقصد اصلی ما در این [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] قسمت قبل در مورد جواهرده صحبت کردم . ولی مقصد اصلی ما در این [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on سفری پر از خاطره by پانوراما</title>
		<link>http://darabi.wordpress.com/2008/07/12/%d8%b3%d9%81%d8%b1%db%8c-%d9%be%d8%b1-%d8%a7%d8%b2-%d8%ae%d8%a7%d8%b7%d8%b1%d9%87/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>پانوراما</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darabi.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-26</guid>
		<description>حرفاتو که میای توی وبلاگ من میزنی
عکسهات رو هم میری توی فلیکر میذاری
 این وبلاگ ترشید دیگه ایمان جان</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>حرفاتو که میای توی وبلاگ من میزنی<br />
عکسهات رو هم میری توی فلیکر میذاری<br />
 این وبلاگ ترشید دیگه ایمان جان</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on سفری پر از خاطره by iman</title>
		<link>http://darabi.wordpress.com/2008/07/12/%d8%b3%d9%81%d8%b1%db%8c-%d9%be%d8%b1-%d8%a7%d8%b2-%d8%ae%d8%a7%d8%b7%d8%b1%d9%87/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>iman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darabi.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-25</guid>
		<description>سری اول عکس های جواهر ده رو اینجا گذاشتم 
http://flickr.com/photos/hamkelasy_camps/tags/%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%87/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>سری اول عکس های جواهر ده رو اینجا گذاشتم<br />
<a href="http://flickr.com/photos/hamkelasy_camps/tags/%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%87/" rel="nofollow">http://flickr.com/photos/hamkelasy_camps/tags/%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%87/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on سفری پر از خاطره by پانوراما</title>
		<link>http://darabi.wordpress.com/2008/07/12/%d8%b3%d9%81%d8%b1%db%8c-%d9%be%d8%b1-%d8%a7%d8%b2-%d8%ae%d8%a7%d8%b7%d8%b1%d9%87/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>پانوراما</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darabi.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-24</guid>
		<description>پس چی شد این عکس ها؟</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>پس چی شد این عکس ها؟</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Running an Open Source project by Reachable</title>
		<link>http://darabi.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/running-an-open-source-project/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Reachable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darabi.wordpress.com/?p=13#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway ... nice blog to visit.

cheers, Reachable!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Anyway &#8230; nice blog to visit.</p>
<p>cheers, Reachable!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don’t forget to be part of Firefox’s Download Day! by پانوراما</title>
		<link>http://darabi.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/don%e2%80%99t-forget-to-be-part-of-firefox%e2%80%99s-download-day/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>پانوراما</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darabi.wordpress.com/?p=25#comment-21</guid>
		<description>خیلی جالبه
ایران توی کشورهای منطقه بیشترین میزان دانلود رو داره

=======================
ایمان
تازه جالب ترش اینه که ایران در این طی این ۲۴ ساعت اول رتبه هفتم رو کسب کرده . 
من موندم که با این اینترنت گازوییلی کشورمون چطوری این طوری شده ؟ 
دی</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>خیلی جالبه<br />
ایران توی کشورهای منطقه بیشترین میزان دانلود رو داره</p>
<p>=======================<br />
ایمان<br />
تازه جالب ترش اینه که ایران در این طی این ۲۴ ساعت اول رتبه هفتم رو کسب کرده .<br />
من موندم که با این اینترنت گازوییلی کشورمون چطوری این طوری شده ؟<br />
دی</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don’t forget to be part of Firefox’s Download Day! by پانوراما</title>
		<link>http://darabi.wordpress.com/2008/06/14/don%e2%80%99t-forget-to-be-part-of-firefox%e2%80%99s-download-day/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>پانوراما</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darabi.wordpress.com/?p=25#comment-20</guid>
		<description>اطاعت امر شد قربان
=================
ایمان 
درود بر تو ای دانلودر خیر خواه </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>اطاعت امر شد قربان<br />
=================<br />
ایمان<br />
درود بر تو ای دانلودر خیر خواه</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Running an Open Source project by Hamid</title>
		<link>http://darabi.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/running-an-open-source-project/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darabi.wordpress.com/?p=13#comment-14</guid>
		<description>thanks for your attention, after all, hope there would be something useful :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for your attention, after all, hope there would be something useful <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Running an Open Source project by iman</title>
		<link>http://darabi.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/running-an-open-source-project/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>iman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darabi.wordpress.com/?p=13#comment-13</guid>
		<description>first i should mention about open source definition and free softwares ( and that&#039;s why i used close source development )

as you know free software is definition of richard  stallman but open source is definition of eric raymond in 1998.

both of them are correct but first one is mostly about social and legal aspects of software development and the last one talks about technical issues; and i prefer to talk about open source definition so i used close source development via open source development model and i mean benefits of open source in technical issues.
&lt;blockquote&gt;companies like IBM maintain their proprietary softwares (or close source ones?!) and open source projects simultaneously. they think, this way, their open source and proprietary worlds get benefit from each other symmetrically&lt;/blockquote&gt;
yes, you&#039;r right . companies like IBM or SUN Maintain their close source softwares, but  as far as it has benefits to them; after a while they start to release codes to benefit from community .

let me give you an example : &lt;a href=&quot;http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/12/232&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; linus torvalds talks about reasons why sun made solaris open source; 
and linus says :
&lt;blockquote&gt;they&#039;ll talk about it. They not only drool after our drivers, they
drool after all the _people_ who write drivers. They&#039;d love to get
kernel developers from Linux, they see that we have a huge amount of
really talented people. So they want to talk things up, and the more
&quot;open source&quot; they can position themselves, the better.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
on the other hand today java is open source, and that&#039;s good ,i&#039;m happy with that ; but did you know that sun is implementing the Java Virtual Machine that runs inside the kernel of the Solaris ( &lt;a href=&quot;http://research.sun.com/techrep/2006/smli_tr-2006-156.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; )? so we can guess that linus is mostly true; open source java + open source solaris + community == &gt; more driver .

and that&#039;s so good , really good , i&#039;m happy which java and solaris are open source ; but we should be aware that why these companies (even google, ibm ... ) do that .
&lt;blockquote&gt;i’m a bit curious to know how a commercial industry could or should help open source? by abandoning their current proprietary (close source) softwares??&lt;/blockquote&gt;
as i said, this is more benefit of companies to open source their softwares (and good for community too).

i think one of the best ways to help community is to help on monetary problems of  community

finally there r lot&#039;s of other ways which commercial industry can help to and benefit from open source community. :)
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first i should mention about open source definition and free softwares ( and that&#8217;s why i used close source development )</p>
<p>as you know free software is definition of richard  stallman but open source is definition of eric raymond in 1998.</p>
<p>both of them are correct but first one is mostly about social and legal aspects of software development and the last one talks about technical issues; and i prefer to talk about open source definition so i used close source development via open source development model and i mean benefits of open source in technical issues.</p>
<blockquote><p>companies like IBM maintain their proprietary softwares (or close source ones?!) and open source projects simultaneously. they think, this way, their open source and proprietary worlds get benefit from each other symmetrically</p></blockquote>
<p>yes, you&#8217;r right . companies like IBM or SUN Maintain their close source softwares, but  as far as it has benefits to them; after a while they start to release codes to benefit from community .</p>
<p>let me give you an example : <a href="http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/12/232" rel="nofollow">here</a> linus torvalds talks about reasons why sun made solaris open source;<br />
and linus says :</p>
<blockquote><p>they&#8217;ll talk about it. They not only drool after our drivers, they<br />
drool after all the _people_ who write drivers. They&#8217;d love to get<br />
kernel developers from Linux, they see that we have a huge amount of<br />
really talented people. So they want to talk things up, and the more<br />
&#8220;open source&#8221; they can position themselves, the better.</p></blockquote>
<p>on the other hand today java is open source, and that&#8217;s good ,i&#8217;m happy with that ; but did you know that sun is implementing the Java Virtual Machine that runs inside the kernel of the Solaris ( <a href="http://research.sun.com/techrep/2006/smli_tr-2006-156.pdf" rel="nofollow">link</a> )? so we can guess that linus is mostly true; open source java + open source solaris + community == &gt; more driver .</p>
<p>and that&#8217;s so good , really good , i&#8217;m happy which java and solaris are open source ; but we should be aware that why these companies (even google, ibm &#8230; ) do that .</p>
<blockquote><p>i’m a bit curious to know how a commercial industry could or should help open source? by abandoning their current proprietary (close source) softwares??</p></blockquote>
<p>as i said, this is more benefit of companies to open source their softwares (and good for community too).</p>
<p>i think one of the best ways to help community is to help on monetary problems of  community</p>
<p>finally there r lot&#8217;s of other ways which commercial industry can help to and benefit from open source community. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Running an Open Source project by Hamid</title>
		<link>http://darabi.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/running-an-open-source-project/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darabi.wordpress.com/?p=13#comment-12</guid>
		<description>what do you mean by the term &quot;close source development&quot;? to be honest, my knowledge in development processes is neither complete nor correct but i think even companies like IBM maintain their proprietary  softwares (or close source ones?!) and open source projects simultaneously. they think, this way, their open source and proprietary worlds get benefit from each other symmetrically. in fact, i&#039;m a bit  curious to know how a commercial industry could or should help open source? by abandoning their current proprietary (close source) softwares??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what do you mean by the term &#8220;close source development&#8221;? to be honest, my knowledge in development processes is neither complete nor correct but i think even companies like IBM maintain their proprietary  softwares (or close source ones?!) and open source projects simultaneously. they think, this way, their open source and proprietary worlds get benefit from each other symmetrically. in fact, i&#8217;m a bit  curious to know how a commercial industry could or should help open source? by abandoning their current proprietary (close source) softwares??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
